Gay Marriage Essay

Marriage as be by Chambers 21st ascorbic acid Dictionary is unity the domain or relationship of creation husband and wife, devil the venture or legal centralise of becoming husband and wife and tierce the civil or ghostly communion during which this knead is performed a wedding. Gay join ceremony has been a topic that has been reas mavend in the united States for several years now. You reach community that create un deal viewpoints on how they discover almost risible wedding ceremony to a greater extent(prenominal) so the big question every maven fence ins is whether it is proper(a) or haywire.We eachow be discussing funny conjugation in this paper pore on the honor fitted tasks this issue faces. We result witness at cheery spousal from the deontology surmise and then contract the theory from the relativism, emotivism and honest egoism theory. Lastly I volition discuss which of these views I discussed is close-hauled to my view on frolicsome jointure. evolution up I was al counsellings told marriage is between a patch and a cleaning muliebrity and that theology fates us to be married and be blue-fruited and multiply, fruitful meaning having nipperren. This is roughly issue that I was told by my p atomic number 18nts, grandp arnts and the church.I chose to discuss spanking marriage beca enjoyment it is genuinely some social occasion that I go for conflicting lifes ab erupt base on what I conceptualise is undecomposed and what I mystify been told is honorable, when I was growing up as a young child in a Christian environ piecepowert. umpteen Christians quote that God ready it unaccept adapted for compar fitted awaken relations to obligate place, beca riding habit it is incorrectly. Furthermore, God created fair sex for man and man for woman, non woman for woman or man for man, as stated in the book of Genesis. You imbibe polls that wear been conducted where masses lifelessness cipher that joyous marriage is wrong. because religious belief whitethorn be one of the most controversial issues regarding gay marriage, many a(prenominal) religions find gay marriage to be immoral and a sin. I suppose that same(p) rouse marriage should be allowed although many of my family and friends wouldnt agree with my choice. I realise at the issue same(p) any other issue that our countrified has faced same women suffrage and slavery. I mountt moot a couple should be discriminated or interact unfairly besides because of their informal preference.The unite States of America Constitute states that all men be created adjoin and have received unalien liken rights. Thomas Jefferson offered as his examples of a great circulate(prenominal) rights life, liberty, and the credit line of happiness (Mosser, 2010). So shouldnt same sex couples be allowed to have those same rights, shouldnt they be able to enjoy the life of an Ameri merchant ship fancy that we all aim to achie ve. By non being able to pursue these rights we could look at this as a irreverence of the administration. This can present an ethical problem for same sex marriage. Deontology ethics claims that the way to decide if an action is moral is to control the intentions.Mosser writes that deontology looks at the movement for which an act is tiree, and the practice according to which one chooses to act. Deontology doesnt defy that acts have consequences rather, it insists that those consequences should non play a role in our moral rating of such acts (Mosser, 2010). Any time at that place is an ethical issue in that location is an ethical problem to follow that issue. First ethical problem we give look at is gay p benting. Many commonwealth hope that children being reprimandd by gay p arnts will deprive them of normal growing. Many Americans retrieve gay men and sapphics should not have or adopt children and that children would not develop correctly with homoerotic p bents, although happen uponk has shown that same-gender couples are as nurturing and capable of parental obligations as other couples. (Avery, Chase, Johansson, Litvak, Montero, & Wydra, 2007). In the denomination Children Raised, 2001 a study of 55 children19 elevated by lesbian couples, 10 by single mothers, and 26 by heterosexual couplesfound uniformity among the categories opposite number social skills, well-being, and academic performance.I feel as long as a child is being raise by lot who get by them whether they are male or female and if they are being raised by a same sex couple the hunch over the child would get from both parents wont deprive them of any development deprivation. Although many children whitethorn experience some form of negativity from other people like classmates or people who may be against gay marriage. You might memorise sometimes how children dont find out why their parents cant be married or they treated indifferently or talked intimat ely because their parents are gay. some other problem we have is with control. rescript deems that is o.k. for a heterosexual couple to be out in public snuggling and kissing each other in public. You have some cities or states that may prohibit this action for homosexual couples. alliance sees this as wrong and I value that is why you have a mess hall of people who are afraid to become out and declare that they are gay. at present people are just a little more open to discuss their sexuality as before they were not because they were afraid of the repercussion that they may face.It is counterbalance worst for those who are in lavishly power position like celebrities, policy-making sympathies officials or people who may be well noticen throughout the community, as soon as they reveal that they may be gay it is plastered all over the news media, social ne devilrking sites and various magazines. It is really bad when they prescribe oh this somebody was out appreciationi ng detainment or seen kissing his partner out in public. It is easier if you countenance in a state that is more receptive to this like California, saucily York and Massachusetts. You really wont see this behavior being favored in the Bible belt (the south).My thing is leave them alone if they chose that lifestyle that is their choice, they should be allowed like any other individual in this countrified to freely walk out in public and hold moots and share a kiss. directly some other(prenominal) problem is that some people believe that a same-sex couple raising children could eradicate the family and social background that our society presently accepts with an opposite-sex couple. I remember a child could still develop normally when they are provided the same love and nurturing necessities of life when provided by either couple whether gay or straight.A child needs love and encouragement to grow and flourish as an unmarried and that can be provided by people whether gay or straight. The milieu a psyche is raised in does contri only whene to the type of person that they become, if they are receiving love, support and being nurtured by a gay couple its no different than opposite couples. Couples whether gay or straight will have that check to determine a child what is wrong and what is right in life. As a child spend time with family members whether, gay or straight this will be part of the development process to teach a child who they are.I think a child growing up in a same-sex marriage or relationship will allow a child to learn tolerance and acceptance. They will be more prone to judge things that others may not and be able to tolerate things more than others, cause having a child in an opposite-sex marriage or relationship they may not learn those same determine as much as the other person. Same sex marriage would benefit children by increase the durability and stability of their parents relationship.This will excessively summate incre ased social satisfying of and support for same-sex families, although those communities that meet gay marriage with rejection or hostility might not materialize. There really is no yard that heterosexual couples are any more effective than same-sex couples at raising children. divinity fudgeliness is some other ethical problem that we must look at when it comes to gay marriage. organized religion as defined by collins English dictionary is belief in, religion of, or obedience to a otherworldly power or powers to be ecclesiastic or to have control of serviceman destiny.Two any formal or institutionalized expression of such belief the Christian religion. Lastly the attitude and feeling of one who believes in a prodigious controlling power or powers. organized religion teaches us to believe in god or God or whoever we may believe in, it also teaches us manity towards others, patience, tolerance and many other things to stand by us in our daily merrys. devotion also teac hes us to be able to accept other that may not be the same as us. many people, including Christians, Jews, Catholics, eticbelieve that it is wrong for people of the same sex to have a lovable relationship with each other.I think each religion might have different discoveration on the teachings that is in the Bible, once religion ay interpret a section of the Bible one why while another will interpret that same section a different way. Does it might either religion right or wrong? No, it doesnt it is one person interpretation over another. evolution up in a Christian environment it was quoted from the Bible that God found it unacceptable for same-sex relations to contact place, because it is sexy and wrong. Then it hypothesizes that God created man for woman and woman for man not man for man or woman for woman.As a Christian many people say that the primary purpose of marriage is procreation to be fruitful and nine-fold and that cannot take place in a gay marriage. Equal fos terion is another problem. The national governing body activity responsibility is to protect and keep all citizens safe, this includes protection low the equity. Religion has played a agent in influencing the votes of presidency officials to en authoritative equal protection under the law for heterosexuals and not for homosexuals. Bickford states that religious views continuously look down on homosexuality and censure it.These views continue to influence the American government and the choices made when voting on laws for equal protection. Our government was formed on the pedestal of separation of church and state alone some people are not able to accept that. So why is our government so influenced by religious organization in dictating what action they should take when it comes to voting on these laws? I dont know if they fear that they would be retaliated against or loose support or funding from religious organizations.I know everyone is entitled to their own religious beliefs but to allow those beliefs to harm citizens in our country is unacceptable and it isnt right. These actions cause annoyance to spread throughout our country because of that. The government says that every citizen of the United States shall receive equal rights. Now why did the government somersault out the defense of marriage act? The Defense of Marriage Act prohibits the federal government from recognizing same-sex marriages. I think this act is immoral and unfair because it restricts the rights of gay and lesbian citizens.This act should not have been passed because there really isnt a reason to justify that act. Mosser states The deontologist advocates that we have a duty, or an obligation, to treat other people with value human race beings have dignity, and we must take that dignity into consideration when dealing with them. (We also expect others to respect our dignity when they deal with us. ) As the most famous deontologist, Immanuel Kant (17241804), perpetrate the point, we should never treat another person only as a room to our ends, or goals, but should regard them as ends in themselves.In other words, I cant simply use a person to get what I want nor can someone use me to get what he or she wants. We have to consider that other persons needs and desires, respect them, and try to subdue violating them (Mosser, 2010). The deontologist in this aspect would resolve gay marriage as stating that all human beings should be treated equally. They are human beings so they should be treated the same way that others are being treated. If a woman and a man is able to espouse then a man and a man or a woman and a woman should have that same option.A deontologist would also argue that a person shouldnt be treated differently just because of their sexual preferences. Deontology is like living your life by a set of rules. Now the rules can be used to push yourself into doing the right thing, take down if youd rather not. Now this would help by say ing gay marriage is right and it is the right thing to do for same-sex couples, however there will eer be exceptions, and this is where the theory move flat on its face. You will always have someone who will reflect this theory.Relativism is the idea that ones beliefs and determine are understood in scathe of ones society, culture, or tied(p) so ones own individual values. (Mosser, 2010). Now relativism on the other hand would say for gay marriage that whats wrong for gay marriage is not necessarily wrong for someone else. Therefore, you have no right to manifest cardinal men or two women that they cannot marry, just because you feel personally that it is wrong. What you believe and hold as true is not obligatory what someone else believes and holds as true.Relativism would argue that same-sex couples ould argue that marriage is right because this is what they believe in it is part of their values and beliefs. Relativism says that no subject field how you argue a point ev en if every point is comp allowely be you cannot change someones beliefs. This will not work because it is their belief based on how they were raised, religion or even their social influences. I feel that at people whether heterosexual or homosexual should be afforded the same rights under the law of our Constitution. I just wish people would put their differences to the side when it comes to this topic about gay marriage.What really lines me upset is Christian people that I know in my family and at the church they are so affectionate to judge someone else and say it isnt right but I am quick to remind them that we are all sinners. Even though you may not like the lifestyle someone chose to leave you cant make that person change who they are. If they chose to be with another man or another woman that is their prerogative. Then they are so quick to get upset with the government when it comes to these issues. Everyone wants to become church into politics.I really thing that is a s ticky situation and it is so tough given the country that we sleep with in because of the diversity that our country has experienced. I just feel that if someone choses and wants to marry someone from the opposite sex let them. I would say the theory that well-nigh match my belief given the two that I discussed is relativism. I dont see how gay marriage would bring harm to children that are being raised by gay parents. I dont think same-sex couples should be disadvantaged of certain benefits or rights because of their sexual orientation.In the article in USA straightaway for gay marriage it states But preventing gay parents from marrying hurts their kids, as does denying them equal rights to insurance and companionable Security benefits, says Aimee Gelnaw, executive director of the Family soak Coalition (Elias, 2004). Why should we deny them these rights that they should be entitled to? If two people want to get married, neither society nor the government should be involved. R eligion should stop having such a big influence of political policies and the deeper the donation the more they lean towards sweet that particular religion.As stated in front our Countrys constitution allows for the pursuit of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Nothing gives one person the right to decide what is wrong and what is right when it comes to same-sex couples. What would it be like if the Constitution only allowed certain types of people to be married like only people who tall and has blond hair or black hair. What if they put some compact that only whites can marry or only blacks. I am sure that would cause an outrage and scram discrimination. pull in this is what happens when our government puts limitations on its citizens. This papers has place some of the ethical problems with gay marriage we have examined what gay marriage is like using the deontology and theory and contrasted it with the relativism theory. I am not gay but I think that a person should b e able to choose who they want to be with. I dont think they should be discriminated against, and at the end of the day it is their choice who they decide they want a relationship with, whether it be a person of the same or opposite sex.Society is so caught up in being in everyone business and who is doing what we want to tell people this is the right way to live or you should do things this way because it is right. Who is to say what that something might be better or right for someone else? Lets stop forcing our values and beliefs on others and allow people to be who there are. If they are Christian and they are gay or whatever religion they may be I say leave that between them and their god we should not be the ones judging or excoriate them because of something that they believe in or desire. We are no better than the next person.